Connect with us

News

Tesla Misses Q1 Goal, Clarifies Model 3 Supercharger Status

Tesla continued to experience a shortage of critical parts for the Model X in Q1, leading to lower than expected production. It says it has remedied the situation and promises it will not happen again when Model 3 production begins.

Published

on

Tesla Model X Signature Series

Amidst all the euphoria surrounding the reveal of the Model 3, Tesla announced on Monday that its deliveries in Q1 fell short of its projections. Elon Musk told analysts during the Q4 earnings call in February the company expected to deliver 80,000 to 90,000 cars in 2016 with 16,000 coming from the first quarter, however the company missed its mark and delivered 14,860 vehicles instead.

Citing Model X supplier issues, the Tesla delivered 2,400 units in Q1, far fewer than the company expected. “The Q1 delivery count was impacted by severe Model X supplier parts shortages in January and February that lasted much longer than initially expected,” the company reported in a statement. “Once these issues were resolved, production and delivery rates improved dramatically.” In fact, weekly production of the Model X jumped to 750 cars in the last two weeks of March, but those cars were not able to be delivered in time to count in the Q1 totals.

Black-Model-X-Falcon-Doors-Open-Side

Elon Musk describes the Tesla Model X as the “best car ever” admitting that Tesla may have over engineered the vehicle.

 

The statement from the company went on to say, “Tesla’s hubris in adding far too much new technology to the Model X in version 1, insufficient supplier capability validation, and Tesla not having broad enough internal capability to manufacture the parts in-house” were to blame for the low number of cars manufactured. “The parts in question were only half a dozen out of more than 8,000 unique parts. Nonetheless missing even one part means a car cannot be delivered. Tesla is addressing all three root causes to ensure that these mistakes aren’t repeated with the Model 3 launch.”

Model 3 Supercharger Access

The company also responded to an inquiry yesterday from Reddit user NewCow, who posted, “Hey all, since there was some confusion about the wording changes on the 3 site, I reached out to my press contact at Tesla to clarify if Supercharging was standard or not.”

Advertisement

He says he got this official response from the company. “All Model 3 will have the capability for Supercharging. We haven’t specified (and aren’t right now) whether supercharging will be free.” NewCow adds, “So the hardware is standard, but still undecided if it will be enabled standard.” That has led to speculation that Supercharger access will be an extra cost option for Model 3 buyers as it was originally for early Model S 60 customers.

 

One final note. Elon has tweeted that the first Model 3 cars will be delivered to those who live closest to the factory. “Reason initial cars are delivered close to factory is to have rapid turnaround on early issues.” In other words, the first cars will serve as beta testers. Any post production quality issues can be addressed as soon as possible and changes made as required to the production process before full production begins. This may be one time when you don’t want to have the first car off the line.

 

Advertisement

"I write about technology and the coming zero emissions revolution."

Comments

Elon Musk

Tesla stock woes are ‘overblown’ considering long-term catalysts: analyst

“We believe the recent stock pullback and sales declines, while significant, are overblown considering the near-term issues impacting the company and the scope of opportunities around the corner.”

Published

on

(Credit: Tesla)

Tesla stock (NASDAQ: TSLA) has been under tremendous pressure as a result of CEO Elon Musk’s involvement in the United States Government and other factors, like tariffs and lower-than-expected delivery figures.

However, one analyst says that the concerns regarding Tesla’s short-term performance are “overblown”, considering all the things the company has in the works for the future.

Mickey Legg, an analyst for Benchmark, wrote in a note on Wednesday that much of the negative narrative that has hovered over Tesla shares for the past few months is exaggerated. Instead of looking at the near-term pullback on shares that has seen a 32 percent drop in share price since the beginning of the year, Legg is encouraging investors to look at the catalysts that lie ahead.

Legg wrote in the note to investors (via MarketWatch):

“We believe the recent stock pullback and sales declines, while significant, are overblown considering the near-term issues impacting the company and the scope of opportunities around the corner. After appreciating over 90% to a high of $488 after the Presidential election, the stock has pulled back to sub-$300 levels.”

Advertisement

The stock has felt immense pressure in the early portion of 2025, especially as some investors are questioning Musk’s focus on Tesla, with some arguing that his CEO role has seemingly taken a backseat to his responsibilities with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Additionally, his capacity in the government has drawn some unwarranted criticism from some, resulting in vandalism and violence from his opposition.

However, Musk’s role with DOGE will eventually come to a close, and Legg is looking forward to that, as well as other catalysts that Tesla has announced in the past. For example, the company said it plans to launch affordable models in the first half of this year:

“Our focus is on the release of a new TSLA model in 2Q25, which in our view could turn around the recent decline in vehicle sales. Furthermore, we’re cautiously optimistic about the rollout of Tesla operated robotaxis as a paid service in Austin, TX scheduled for June. While the scope of the initial rollout is expected to be limited, we are focused on the rate of expansion of the operation both in Austin and to other cities.”

Legg finished by stating that he is under the impression that a reduced capacity in DOGE by Musk would be massive for the stock:

Advertisement

“Recent headlines suggest Musk could be reducing his role with the White House, and we can see political backlash diminishing as the year progresses. In our view there is significant potential for a stock rebound, and we believe the breadth of near-term opportunities outweigh headwinds.”

Tesla shares are up over 20 percent as of 3:22 p.m. on the East Coast.

Continue Reading

News

Destroying Tesla stores partially acceptable, says nearly 40% of U.S. study’s respondents

It appears that a growing number of people are willing to justify or even applaud the idea of killing people like Elon Musk or Donald Trump.

Published

on

Credit: Andrea Conway/X

A study from the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) has revealed a rather disturbing trend in the United States. Based on the study, it appears that a growing number of people are willing to justify or even applaud the idea of killing people like Elon Musk or Donald Trump. A notable number of the study’s respondents also stated that they find it partially acceptable to destroy Tesla stores as a form of protest.

The NCRI Study

The NCRI’s study was initiated to determine people’s support for political violence. As per the organization, calls for political violence towards people like Trump and Musk are becoming increasingly normalized. The same is true for property destruction, such as the firebombing of Tesla stores and Superchargers and the vandalism of consumer vehicles. 

For its study, the NCRI surveyed 1,264 U.S. residents, balanced to reflect census data on race/ethnicity, gender, age, and education. Respondents were then asked demographic information, political identity, several political and psychological scales, and questions concerning their acceptance of specific forms of political violence.

Musk, Tesla, and Trump

Some troubling trends emerged from the study, including the fact that 57.6% of respondents who self-identified as left of center stated that destroying Tesla dealerships is partially acceptable. Even more disturbing was the fact that 48.6% of respondents who self-identified as left of center reported that if someone murdered Elon Musk, they would at least be somewhat justified. For U.S. President Donald Trump, this number was higher at 55.2%.

Without isolating respondents who self-identified as left of center, 39.8% of the study’s respondents still stated that destroying Tesla stores is partially acceptable, 31.6% still stated that killing Elon Musk was somewhat justified, and 38.5% still stated that killing Donald Trump was somewhat justified.

What the NCRI Says

Joel Finkelstein, the lead author of the NCRI’s study, stated that an “assassination culture” of sorts is emerging, especially following the death of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in the hands of Luigi Mangione in December 2024. As could be seen in social media activity of people against Musk or Trump, calls for the assassination of the CEO and President are abounding among their harshest critics.

“What was formerly taboo culturally has become acceptable. We are seeing a clear shift – glorification, increased attempts, and changing norms – all converging into what we define as ‘assassination culture.’ It’s not just Luigi anymore. We’re seeing an expansion: Trump, Musk and others are now being openly discussed as legitimate targets, often cloaked in meme culture and gamified online dialogue,” Finkelstein stated.

Advertisement

Below is a video about the NCRI’s study.

And below is the NCRI’s study itself.

NCRI Assassination Culture Brief by Simon Alvarez on Scribd

Continue Reading

Elon Musk

Tesla CEO Elon Musk and fmr VP candidate Tim Walz continue war of words

Elon Musk and Tim Walz continue trading barbs as the former VP candidate called the Tesla CEO a “greedy bastard.”

Published

on

Credit: MINISTÉRIO DAS COMUNICAÇÕES, CC BY 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons | Tim Walz on X

Tesla CEO Elon Musk and former Vice Presidential candidate Tim Walz are continuing their war of words against one another as the Minnesota politician made more comments last evening.

Musk then responded to those comments today in a post on X.

Walz said last night that Musk is a “greedy bastard” who did not pay taxes after he became successful. The former VP hopeful also said that “people like Elon Musk” should be demonized:

“Once you become successful, don’t be a greedy bastard and not pay your taxes. I don’t think we should be the party that demonizes someone because they can afford something—they worked hard & got something. We should demonize people like Elon Musk. That’s different.”

These comments from Walz follow previous statements he made about Tesla stock, stating that when it goes down, he gets a boost. These comments were met with criticism from people in various sectors, including Shark Tank’s Kevin O’Leary, who is nicknamed “Mr. Wonderful.”

O’Leary called Walz out for hoping Tesla shares drop as they are a holding in the Minnesota Pension Fund. Walz said the comments were just a joke.

Musk chose to respond to Walz’s comments from last night this morning in a response to the above X post, calling him “a liar”:

Funny enough, Musk has not avoided paying his taxes. In fact, in 2021, he paid the largest single-year tax bill in American history, as he wrote a cheque to the IRS for $11 billion:

Elon Musk’s 2021 taxes equates to over $1.5 million for every day he’s been a US citizen

It is unclear why Walz continues to speak negatively about Musk, especially as it seems he is going out of his way to do so. More than likely, it is to continue pushback against Musk’s involvement with the Trump Administration.

Continue Reading

Trending